Law wars: the patient menace.
نویسنده
چکیده
©FSRH J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008: 34(4) Oh bollocks. Now patients have a legal right to register with me. So no more sympathetic ‘TV doctor’ facial expressions explaining that because they live outside our catchment area I’m really sorry but you can’t come and grace us with your nasty problems. In recent years schools have made this method of discrimination easy for us. They started it – to coin a playground explanation – by introducing catchment areas. The schools justify it because there are only so many students that can be accommodated, taught, and looked after safely. Likewise in general practice there are only so many patients that I can seat in the waiting room, tolerate, and fool that I care. Years ago during my turbulent hormone years as the oldest child in our family I had to fight for the right to get some sex education – to stay up and watch Pan’s People on Top of the Pops, to go into town without my parents, and drink shandy. But my younger siblings, they got to do all of these things without any battles. Similarly, schools have taken the flack whilst establishing this as ‘the way it is’, so we in general practice have been able to allege catchment areas and nobody questions it. But they’re bloody well going to question it now, aren’t they? We’re right back to the years of the last century and that damned ‘Patients Charter’. Back then it was constant leaflet waving, demanding antibiotics, unnecessary home visits, and middle-of-the-night calls “because it’s my right”. At least back then those of us with balls (metaphorically speaking) fired back with ‘Your Responsibilities’ until impotent health authorities found out about this and hypocritically said that wasn’t fair. Now the legal right to register anywhere means we won’t have a chance to fight back. Or will we? Everyone is jumping on the ‘choice’ bandwagon. Choose and Book now gives patients a choice of where they are seen. Ironically this choice has always been available but in reality now the choice is actually less than ever. Even family planning experts are campaigning for more choice for their users with this lark about LARCs. So I’m going to give my patients choice too. You can come and register with me wherever you’re from. Just be aware that you may have to wait weeks for an appointment, or if you use the 48-hour service we offer you’d better be ready to call in using at least three phones because you’ve more chance of getting through on a national radio competition line, or to the Department of Health for that matter, than you have of getting through to us: despite now offering sixteen or more lines it’s still only Beryl and Gladys from the ‘Return to Work After Retirement’ scheme at the end of them. They’re the only ones willing to tolerate the abuse we get from patients who say: “Do you know how far I’ve had to come to see this doctor? What do you mean I’m going to have to wait?” Yes, we might quickly become overloaded because we’re such a good practice, but we can use this to our advantage. Not only financially, but as self-promotion. With a packed waiting room we’ll be seen as desirable, promoting our practice as ‘a good product’. It also means Law wars: the patient menace
منابع مشابه
Consumerism versus Producerism: On the Global Menace of "Consumerism" and the Mission of Comparative Law
متن کامل
Reasons behind the Failure of Right to Peace in Today’s World
The right to peace and global security are considered as critical rights and necessities for human life, the realization of which requires support of the global society. Initially, the establishment of the United Nations made people believe that they are achieving this significant matter, and a major part of problems caused by disagreements and growing wars are being solved. Unfortunately, this...
متن کاملEvolutionary Psychological Foundations of Civil Wars
I propose an evolutionary psychological perspective on wars and suggest that the ultimate cause of intergroup conflict may be the relative availability of reproductive women. Polygyny, which allows some men to monopolize all reproductive opportunities and exclude others, may increase the prevalence of civil wars, but not interstate wars, which did not exist in the ancestral environment. The ana...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of family planning and reproductive health care
دوره 34 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008